Archives for: August 2010, 18
Repeat Securities Law Offender Charged With Operating Ponzi Scheme
By Securities Law on Aug 18, 2010 | In Legal Actions
Laurence M. Brown is being charged for the second time for violating federal securities laws in connection with another offering fraud. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Brown and fellow certified public accountant (CPA) Ronald Mangini with fraud for allegedly selling phony securities to investors and pocketing the money.
The two Westchester County residents allegedly sold investors fake promissory notes and common stock in Infinity Reserves-Tennessee Inc., an inoperative company owned by a client of their accounting firm. The duo took the company name and represented themselves as senior officers with authority to sell the securities.
As early as 2008, Brown and Mangini began selling the securities to clients of their accounting practice and other investors, according to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan.
The SEC claims Brown and Mangini promoted Infinity Reserves as being a profitable company operating a gas pipeline in Tennessee. They proclaimed to have a “captive market in its area and a stable minimum rate of production with quality gas that could be sold well above market prices.” The alleged fake notes promised investors a 10 percent annual return that would be paid semiannually on the principal amount of the investment.
According to the SEC complaint, Infinity Reserves owns a gas gathering and trunk pipeline system located in Tennessee that has not operated for more than a decade. The offering document put together by Brown and Mangini allegedly portrayed the investment as interests in an active system.
The pair reportedly raised more than $2.1 million from investors, returning approximately $136,000 to certain investors in the form of interest payments. In typical Ponzi scheme fashion, at least $1.6 million of investor funds were allegedly transferred to personal bank accounts controlled by Brown, Mangini, or family members, who are being named as relief defendants.
The SEC charged the CPAs with violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, and seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of the defendants’ and of relief defendants’ ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.
SEC Approves Changes To Investment Adviser Brochure
By Securities Law on Aug 18, 2010 | In Legal Actions
For the past 21 years investment advisors registered with the SEC have been required to provide clients with a brochure explaining the adviser’s qualifications, investment strategies, and business practices. Recently the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted new rules regarding the information that registered investment advisers must provide to their clients and prospective clients.
The brochure is comprised of the second part of the investment advisors SEC registration form, known as Form ADV Part 2.
According to SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro, the amendments to Part 2 “will help transform the brochure into a plain English narrative that is well-suited to serve investors’ needs.”
The changes will add depth to the descriptions of investment advisers’ explanations of advisory services, fees, methods of risk analysis, disciplinary history, code of ethics, and brokerage practices.
One of the biggest changes is the disclosure of conflicts of interests, which will be followed by an explanation of how the investment adviser addresses those conflicts. This change is notable for advisers or an affiliate who might have a material financial interest in a client account for which it makes recommendations to clients, or buys or sells. “The investment advisor must also disclose whether it or an affiliate invests (or is allowed to invest) in the same securities that it recommends to clients or in related securities, such as options or other derivatives.” In addition, an investment adviser that “trades in the recommended securities at or around the same time as the client has to explain the specific conflicts of interest.”
Other conflicts of interest outlined on the brochure will include performance-based fees that an investment adviser may receive from some accounts and not others, as well as soft dollar practices, client referrals, directed brokerage and trade aggregation.
The current format of the brochure is made up of advisers’ responses to a series of multiple choice and fill-in-the-blank questions, which in some cases does not allow investment advisors to bet describe their business or conflicts.